Feature Requests

would love if the chrome extension showed when someone I'm connected to has reviewed a profile. currently have to click thorugh the site and sift to see reviews from epople I know, which means I only do it when i'm really curious about the score - maybe 10% of the time. but if I could see a small indicator that 2-3 people in my network have reviewed someone, I'd likely click through way more often to read what they actually said. social proof from trusted sources is a much stronger engagement driver than raw credibility scores. I could see leaving them out as probably to drive traffic or reduce clutter in the ext. but even if its just PFPs in the overlay it could work --- i actually think this would actually drive more traffic to the app because instead of random clicking based on curiosity, you get targetd clicking based on people you trust. "your best friends john and sarah reviewed this person" creates way more pull than just seeing a 1400 score.

The social component of DeBank is very well developed. There are some highly influential content creators on the platform, and thanks to the existing credibility score, it could be a valuable addition as a connected profile on Ethos. The credibility score on DeBank reflects on-chain activity, portfolio quality, and social engagement, offering a transparent, data-driven indicator of a user’s reputation in the crypto space.

Would like to be able to attest Github to bring Github to my Ethos profile and potentially earn credibility score for it.

would it make sense to add a feature to the browser extension that allows users to report hacked accounts to help prevent scams? I'm not an expert, but I wonder if this could be useful for damage control when an account gets compromised. Perhaps an alert system could help, rather than simply placing distrust on the account owner, who may have their own faults.

The current color scheme for the status meter could benefit from adjustments to better align with color theory and psychological associations. Example: The yellow/gold used for "Questionable" may feel overly positive for a status that suggests uncertainty or caution. Ngl, it has thrown me off sometimes (ref: screenshot). Suggestion: Kindly consider the following revised color scheme: Untrusted: dark red Questionable: Amber or orange Neutral: gray or beige Reputable: blue Exemplary: green This would create a more intuitive progression from negative to positive while maintaining clear distinctions between statuses. emilios.eth

Ethos refers to the characteristic spirit, moral values, or guiding beliefs of a person, group, or organization. It encompasses the attitudes, habits, and values that define the culture or identity of a community or institution12. For example, a company’s ethos might include principles like integrity, innovation, and respect for the environment3. In rhetoric, ethos is one of the three modes of persuasion, alongside pathos (emotional appeal) and logos (logical appeal), and it focuses on the credibility and ethical character of the speaker3.

I can tweet "A Voted/Slashed B for ... reason" after doing something in Ethos. It could be dangerous because it's like saying out loud how I see someone in X so it needs to be implemented with discretion. But still good for promoting the app I think.

Was thinking users evaluate crypto project's profiles by its transparency, competency, communication, etc. Ethos could serve as a distributed Trustpilot for crypto projects. It could also be applied to regular users but will require different metrics.

It doesn't seem right to give everyone the same score at the beginning. Let's try to at least give a fair score to knowledgeable accounts, based on the activity.

At start I had a feeling that to unlock it I will get it instant. But now I have a feeling that I need continue do something to get it after some "event" Probably it make sense to say "when" I will get sticker